Laos vs Libya: Men's universal right to vote
Laos
1
in 2025
Libya
1
in 2025
Laos rank
1st
Libya rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Laos
- Libya
How they compare
Laos currently reports 1 against 1 in Libya, a difference of 0.
Across all 231 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 24 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | Libya |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Laos or Libya?
- Laos, at 1 against 1 in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Laos and Libya?
- 0, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Libya?
- 231 years are reported by both, from 1795 to 2025.
- How do Laos and Libya rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Laos ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.