Liechtenstein vs Taiwan: Men's universal right to vote
Liechtenstein
1
in 2025
Taiwan
1
in 2025
Liechtenstein rank
1st
Taiwan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Liechtenstein
- Taiwan
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 1 against 1 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 131 shared years of data; in 1895 it was Taiwan ahead.
Liechtenstein ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Liechtenstein |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Liechtenstein |
| 1940s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Liechtenstein |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Liechtenstein or Taiwan?
- Liechtenstein, at 1 against 1 in Taiwan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Liechtenstein and Taiwan?
- 0, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Taiwan?
- 131 years are reported by both, from 1895 to 2025.
- How do Liechtenstein and Taiwan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Liechtenstein ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.