Luxembourg vs Moldova: Men's universal right to vote
Luxembourg
1
in 2025
Moldova
1
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
1st
Moldova rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Luxembourg
- Moldova
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 1 against 1 in Moldova, a difference of 0.
Across all 191 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Moldova |
| 1910s | 0.1 | 1 | 0.9 | Moldova |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Luxembourg or Moldova?
- Luxembourg, at 1 against 1 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Luxembourg and Moldova?
- 0, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Moldova?
- 191 years are reported by both, from 1815 to 2025.
- How do Luxembourg and Moldova rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Luxembourg ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.