Madagascar vs Suriname: Men's universal right to vote
Madagascar
1
in 2025
Suriname
1
in 2025
Madagascar rank
1st
Suriname rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Madagascar
- Suriname
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 1 against 1 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 163 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Suriname |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Suriname |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Madagascar or Suriname?
- Madagascar, at 1 against 1 in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Madagascar and Suriname?
- 0, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Suriname?
- 163 years are reported by both, from 1863 to 2025.
- How do Madagascar and Suriname rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Madagascar ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.