Malaysia vs Paraguay: Men's universal right to vote
Malaysia
1
in 2025
Paraguay
1
in 2025
Malaysia rank
1st
Paraguay rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Malaysia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1 against 1 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 152 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0 | 0.6667 | 0.6667 | Paraguay |
| 1880s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 1950s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Paraguay |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Malaysia or Paraguay?
- Malaysia, at 1 against 1 in Paraguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Malaysia and Paraguay?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Paraguay?
- 152 years are reported by both, from 1874 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Paraguay rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.