Marshall Islands vs Mexico: Men's universal right to vote
Marshall Islands
1
in 2025
Mexico
1
in 2025
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Mexico rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Marshall Islands
- Mexico
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Mexico, a difference of 0.
Across all 151 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mexico |
| 1880s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mexico |
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mexico |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mexico |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mexico |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mexico |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mexico |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mexico |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Marshall Islands or Mexico?
- Marshall Islands, at 1 against 1 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Marshall Islands and Mexico?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mexico?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1875 to 2025.
- How do Marshall Islands and Mexico rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.