Moldova vs Paraguay: Men's universal right to vote
Moldova
1
in 2025
Paraguay
1
in 2025
Moldova rank
1st
Paraguay rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Moldova
- Paraguay
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 1 against 1 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 195 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | Paraguay |
| 1880s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 1900s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Paraguay |
| 1910s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Moldova or Paraguay?
- Moldova, at 1 against 1 in Paraguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Moldova and Paraguay?
- 0, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Paraguay?
- 195 years are reported by both, from 1811 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Paraguay rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Moldova ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.