Monaco vs Vietnam: Men's universal right to vote
Monaco
1
in 2025
Vietnam
1
in 2025
Monaco rank
1st
Vietnam rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Monaco
- Vietnam
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 1 against 1 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 190 shared years of data; in 1814 it was Vietnam ahead.
Monaco ranks 1st and Vietnam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 21 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Monaco |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Monaco or Vietnam?
- Monaco, at 1 against 1 in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Monaco and Vietnam?
- 0, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Vietnam?
- 190 years are reported by both, from 1814 to 2025.
- How do Monaco and Vietnam rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Monaco ranks 1st and Vietnam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.