Morocco vs Solomon Islands: Men's universal right to vote
Morocco
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Morocco rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Morocco
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1893 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Morocco ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | Morocco |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Morocco or Solomon Islands?
- Morocco, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Morocco and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Solomon Islands?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Morocco and Solomon Islands rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Morocco ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.