Sao Tome and Principe vs Tanzania: Men's universal right to vote
Sao Tome and Principe
1
in 2025
Tanzania
1
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Tanzania
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1 against 1 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.
Across all 112 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | Tanzania |
| 1970s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Tanzania |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Sao Tome and Principe or Tanzania?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 1 against 1 in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Sao Tome and Principe and Tanzania?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Tanzania?
- 112 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2025.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Tanzania rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.