Solomon Islands vs Spain: Men's universal right to vote
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Spain
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Spain rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Solomon Islands
- Spain
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Spain, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1893 it was Spain ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 14 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Spain |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Spain |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Spain |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Spain |
| 1930s | 0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | Spain |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Solomon Islands |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Solomon Islands |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Solomon Islands or Spain?
- Solomon Islands, at 1 against 1 in Spain as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Solomon Islands and Spain?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Spain?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Solomon Islands and Spain rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.