Solomon Islands vs Sri Lanka: Men's universal right to vote
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Solomon Islands
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
Across all 133 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | Sri Lanka |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Solomon Islands or Sri Lanka?
- Solomon Islands, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Solomon Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Solomon Islands and Sri Lanka rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.