Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Venezuela: Men's universal right to vote
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Venezuela
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Venezuela rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Venezuela
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1 against 1 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.
Across all 89 years both countries report, Venezuela has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Venezuela ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Venezuela |
| 1950s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | Venezuela |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Venezuela?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1 against 1 in Venezuela as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Venezuela?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Venezuela?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Venezuela rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Venezuela ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.