Suriname vs Tunisia: Men's universal right to vote
Suriname
1
in 2025
Tunisia
1
in 2025
Suriname rank
1st
Tunisia rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Suriname
- Tunisia
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1 against 1 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 163 shared years of data; in 1863 it was Tunisia ahead.
Suriname ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Suriname |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Suriname |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Suriname or Tunisia?
- Suriname, at 1 against 1 in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Suriname and Tunisia?
- 0, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tunisia?
- 163 years are reported by both, from 1863 to 2025.
- How do Suriname and Tunisia rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Suriname ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.