East Timor vs Uruguay: Men's universal right to vote
East Timor
1
in 2025
Uruguay
1
in 2025
East Timor rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- East Timor
- Uruguay
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 1 against 1 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 167 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
East Timor ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 18 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Timor | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Uruguay |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1950s | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | Uruguay |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, East Timor or Uruguay?
- East Timor, at 1 against 1 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between East Timor and Uruguay?
- 0, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Uruguay?
- 167 years are reported by both, from 1859 to 2025.
- How do East Timor and Uruguay rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- East Timor ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.