United Kingdom vs Vanuatu: Men's universal right to vote
United Kingdom
1
in 2025
Vanuatu
1
in 2025
United Kingdom rank
1st
Vanuatu rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- United Kingdom
- Vanuatu
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 1 against 1 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 120 shared years of data; in 1906 it was Vanuatu ahead.
United Kingdom ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 198 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Kingdom | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | United Kingdom |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | United Kingdom |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, United Kingdom or Vanuatu?
- United Kingdom, at 1 against 1 in Vanuatu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between United Kingdom and Vanuatu?
- 0, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Vanuatu?
- 120 years are reported by both, from 1906 to 2025.
- How do United Kingdom and Vanuatu rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- United Kingdom ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.