Uruguay vs Vietnam: Men's universal right to vote
Uruguay
1
in 2025
Vietnam
1
in 2025
Uruguay rank
1st
Vietnam rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Uruguay
- Vietnam
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 1 against 1 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 179 shared years of data; in 1825 it was Vietnam ahead.
Uruguay ranks 1st and Vietnam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uruguay | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Uruguay |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Uruguay or Vietnam?
- Uruguay, at 1 against 1 in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Uruguay and Vietnam?
- 0, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Vietnam?
- 179 years are reported by both, from 1825 to 2025.
- How do Uruguay and Vietnam rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Uruguay ranks 1st and Vietnam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.