Armenia vs Serbia: Value-added tax (VAT), Ratio of this level of government's revenue
Value-added tax (VAT), Ratio of this level of government's revenue over time
- Armenia
- Serbia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 1 against 1 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 3rd of 70 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0.0041 | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value-added tax (vat), ratio of this level of government's revenue, Armenia or Serbia?
- Armenia, at 1 against 1 in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in value-added tax (vat), ratio of this level of government's revenue between Armenia and Serbia?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Serbia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Serbia rank globally for value-added tax (vat), ratio of this level of government's revenue?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 3rd of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Value-added tax (VAT), Ratio of this level of government's revenue from this item to total general government revenue from this item, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.