Republic of Korea vs Uzbekistan: Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent
Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent over time
- Republic of Korea
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports -0.2646 against -0.3885 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.1239.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 54th and Uzbekistan ranks 51st of 64 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.5497 | -0.461 | 0.0887 | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | -0.3885 | -0.2646 | 0.1239 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vertical fiscal imbalance, percent, Republic of Korea or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at -0.2646 against -0.3885 in Republic of Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in vertical fiscal imbalance, percent between Republic of Korea and Uzbekistan?
- 0.1239, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Uzbekistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Republic of Korea and Uzbekistan rank globally for vertical fiscal imbalance, percent?
- Republic of Korea ranks 54th and Uzbekistan ranks 51st of 64 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.