Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate in IDA only
IDA only: Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate was -8.26 % change on previous year in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate in IDA only, 1990–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
IDA only recorded -8.26 % change on previous year for armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate in 2020.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 654.9% on the previous year and down 244.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate in IDA only peaked at 82.82 % change on previous year in 1995 and was at its lowest, -18.04 % change on previous year, in 2001.
That places IDA only 35th out of 43 groups with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate in IDA only, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 6.86 % change on previous year | — |
| 1991 | -1.27 % change on previous year | -118.6% |
| 1992 | -2.53 % change on previous year | +98.7% |
| 1993 | 2.09 % change on previous year | -182.5% |
| 1994 | -7.78 % change on previous year | -472.7% |
| 1995 | 82.82 % change on previous year | -1164.5% |
| 1996 | 3.36 % change on previous year | -95.9% |
| 1997 | 0.1259 % change on previous year | -96.3% |
| 1998 | -0.5989 % change on previous year | -575.5% |
| 1999 | 5.25 % change on previous year | -976.8% |
| 2000 | 0.1639 % change on previous year | -96.9% |
| 2001 | -18.04 % change on previous year | -11107.0% |
| 2002 | 8.77 % change on previous year | -148.6% |
| 2003 | -0.4085 % change on previous year | -104.7% |
| 2004 | -5.36 % change on previous year | +1212.1% |
| 2005 | -0.138 % change on previous year | -97.4% |
| 2008 | 1.52 % change on previous year | -1202.7% |
| 2009 | 6.66 % change on previous year | +337.7% |
| 2010 | 5.71 % change on previous year | -14.3% |
| 2011 | -0.3476 % change on previous year | -106.1% |
| 2012 | 0.4314 % change on previous year | -224.1% |
| 2013 | -1.06 % change on previous year | -344.9% |
| 2014 | -0.7212 % change on previous year | -31.7% |
| 2015 | 1.24 % change on previous year | -272.3% |
| 2016 | -1.19 % change on previous year | -196.1% |
| 2017 | -3.03 % change on previous year | +153.4% |
| 2018 | -0.5902 % change on previous year | -80.5% |
| 2019 | 1.49 % change on previous year | -352.2% |
| 2020 | -8.26 % change on previous year | -654.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.83 % change on previous year | -7.78 % change on previous year | 82.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.855 % change on previous year | -18.04 % change on previous year | 8.77 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 2010s | 0.1934 % change on previous year | -3.03 % change on previous year | 5.71 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -8.26 % change on previous year | -8.26 % change on previous year | -8.26 % change on previous year | 1 |
More public sector data for IDA only
- Arms imports 825.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.6649 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -20.9 % change on previous year (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 825.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 20.41 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0146 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 21.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 25.89 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 40.44 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate in IDA only?
- Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate in IDA only was -8.26 % change on previous year in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate recorded in IDA only?
- The highest recorded value was 82.82 % change on previous year in 1995.
- What is the lowest armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate recorded in IDA only?
- The lowest recorded value was -18.04 % change on previous year in 2001.
- How does IDA only rank for armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate?
- IDA only ranks 35th out of 43 groups with data for 2020.
- Is armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate rising or falling in IDA only?
- Over the last ten years it is down 244.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA only data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Armed forces personnel, total. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Armed forces personnel, total The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Armed forces personnel, total. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.