Armed forces personnel, total, per unit of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Armed forces personnel, total, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Armed forces personnel, total, per unit of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1990–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2020, armed forces personnel, total, per unit of gdp in Central Europe and the Baltics stood at 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of up 3.7% on the previous year and down 15.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, armed forces personnel, total, per unit of gdp in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1993 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2019.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 35th of 43 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Armed forces personnel, total, per unit of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +19.8% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.4% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.3% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -24.7% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.0% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.9% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -25.7% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.1% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -23.0% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +11.8% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +19.5% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +13.0% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 1 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
More public sector data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Arms imports 2.91 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 29.09 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0012 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 21.6 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 2.91 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 711.87 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0289 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 34.86 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 71.23 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 2,166 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is armed forces personnel, total, per unit of gdp in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Armed forces personnel, total, per unit of gdp in Central Europe and the Baltics was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest armed forces personnel, total, per unit of gdp recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1993.
- What is the lowest armed forces personnel, total, per unit of gdp recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for armed forces personnel, total, per unit of gdp?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 35th out of 43 groups with data for 2020.
- Is armed forces personnel, total, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Armed forces personnel, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Armed forces personnel, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Armed forces personnel, total ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Armed forces personnel, total The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Armed forces personnel, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.