CPIA building human resources rating in Low income

Low income: CPIA building human resources rating was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.25 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 1.0%
Rank
35th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.39 1=low to 6=high
in 2014
All-time low
3.2 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA building human resources rating in Low income, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia building human resources rating in Low income is 3.25 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.

That represents a change of down 1.0% on the previous year and down 4.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia building human resources rating in Low income peaked at 3.39 1=low to 6=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 3.2 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

Low income ranks 35th of 42 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

CPIA building human resources rating in Low income, year by year

Annual values for CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) in Low income, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.21 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.2 1=low to 6=high -0.3%
2007 3.23 1=low to 6=high +0.8%
2008 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.8%
2009 3.24 1=low to 6=high -0.4%
2010 3.29 1=low to 6=high +1.5%
2011 3.36 1=low to 6=high +2.2%
2012 3.36 1=low to 6=high +0.2%
2013 3.36 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.39 1=low to 6=high +0.7%
2015 3.39 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.34 1=low to 6=high -1.3%
2017 3.28 1=low to 6=high -1.7%
2018 3.39 1=low to 6=high +3.2%
2019 3.28 1=low to 6=high -3.1%
2020 3.3 1=low to 6=high +0.7%
2021 3.3 1=low to 6=high -0.3%
2022 3.28 1=low to 6=high -0.4%
2023 3.28 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.28 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3.25 1=low to 6=high -1.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.22 1=low to 6=high 3.2 1=low to 6=high 3.25 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.34 1=low to 6=high 3.28 1=low to 6=high 3.39 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.28 1=low to 6=high 3.25 1=low to 6=high 3.3 1=low to 6=high 6

More public sector data for Low income

All data for Low income →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia building human resources rating in Low income?
Cpia building human resources rating in Low income was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Low income?
The highest recorded value was 3.39 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
What is the lowest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Low income?
The lowest recorded value was 3.2 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does Low income rank for cpia building human resources rating?
Low income ranks 35th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia building human resources rating rising or falling in Low income?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Low income data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA building human resources rating in Low income. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-building-human-resources-rating-1-low-to-6-high/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-building-human-resources-rating-1-low-to-6-high/low-income/">CPIA building human resources rating in Low income</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.