CPIA building human resources rating in Pacific island small states

Pacific island small states: CPIA building human resources rating was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.33 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
34th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2024
All-time low
3.12 1=low to 6=high
in 2017
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA building human resources rating in Pacific island small states, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia building human resources rating in Pacific island small states is 3.33 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia building human resources rating in Pacific island small states peaked at 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2024 and was at its lowest, 3.12 1=low to 6=high, in 2017.

Pacific island small states ranks 34th of 42 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

CPIA building human resources rating in Pacific island small states, year by year

Annual values for CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) in Pacific island small states, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.2 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3.2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.14 1=low to 6=high -1.8%
2012 3.19 1=low to 6=high +1.4%
2013 3.25 1=low to 6=high +2.0%
2014 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3.12 1=low to 6=high -3.8%
2018 3.12 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.12 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3.17 1=low to 6=high +1.3%
2021 3.22 1=low to 6=high +1.8%
2022 3.28 1=low to 6=high +1.7%
2023 3.28 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.33 1=low to 6=high +1.7%
2025 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.2 1=low to 6=high 3.2 1=low to 6=high 3.2 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.19 1=low to 6=high 3.12 1=low to 6=high 3.25 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.27 1=low to 6=high 3.17 1=low to 6=high 3.33 1=low to 6=high 6

More public sector data for Pacific island small states

All data for Pacific island small states →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia building human resources rating in Pacific island small states?
Cpia building human resources rating in Pacific island small states was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Pacific island small states?
The highest recorded value was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2024.
What is the lowest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Pacific island small states?
The lowest recorded value was 3.12 1=low to 6=high in 2017.
How does Pacific island small states rank for cpia building human resources rating?
Pacific island small states ranks 34th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia building human resources rating rising or falling in Pacific island small states?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Pacific island small states data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA building human resources rating in Pacific island small states. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-building-human-resources-rating-1-low-to-6-high/pacific-island-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-building-human-resources-rating-1-low-to-6-high/pacific-island-small-states/">CPIA building human resources rating in Pacific island small states</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.