CPIA debt policy rating in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: CPIA debt policy rating was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA debt policy rating in Afghanistan, 2006–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia debt policy rating in Afghanistan stood at 1.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 19 years on record.
The figure is down 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia debt policy rating in Afghanistan peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 1.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2022.
That places Afghanistan 80th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.
CPIA debt policy rating in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2010 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -28.6% |
| 2011 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | -40.0% |
| 2023 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
| 2010s | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.7 1=low to 6=high | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
More public sector data for Afghanistan
- Arms imports 65.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 1.62 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0046 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -71.86 % change on previous year (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 65.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 6.96 current USD per person (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0195 current USD per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -0.4743 % change on previous year (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 278.25 million current USD (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 99.66 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia debt policy rating in Afghanistan?
- Cpia debt policy rating in Afghanistan was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- What is the lowest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2022.
- How does Afghanistan rank for cpia debt policy rating?
- Afghanistan ranks 80th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia debt policy rating rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).