CPIA debt policy rating in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: CPIA debt policy rating was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2010. ▬ Flat
CPIA debt policy rating in Azerbaijan, 2005–2010
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2010, cpia debt policy rating in Azerbaijan stood at 4.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of down 10.0% on the previous year and unchanged over ten years.
Azerbaijan ranks 3rd of 84 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
CPIA debt policy rating in Azerbaijan, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +11.1% |
| 2008 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | -10.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.8 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 1 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
- 1 Georgia 5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Kosovo 5 1=low to 6=high
- 3 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Burkina Faso 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Cambodia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Côte d'Ivoire 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Guyana 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Kyrgyzstan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Madagascar 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Uzbekistan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Azerbaijan
- Arms imports 28.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 2.74 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0004 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 833.33 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 28.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 370.2 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0507 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 6.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 3.78 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 36.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia debt policy rating in Azerbaijan?
- Cpia debt policy rating in Azerbaijan was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2010, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was 5 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
- What is the lowest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for cpia debt policy rating?
- Azerbaijan ranks 3rd out of 84 countries with data for 2010.
- Is cpia debt policy rating rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).