CPIA debt policy rating in Lesotho, Kingdom of

Lesotho, Kingdom of: CPIA debt policy rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
29th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA debt policy rating in Lesotho, Kingdom of, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 4 1=low to 6=high2006: 4 1=low to 6=high2007: 4 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 4 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 4 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia debt policy rating in Lesotho, Kingdom of is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia debt policy rating in Lesotho, Kingdom of peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.

Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 29th of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.8 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Lesotho, Kingdom of

  1. 29 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 29 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 29 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 29 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 29 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 29 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 29 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 29 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 29 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 29 Solomon Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 29 Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 29 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Lesotho, Kingdom of

All data for Lesotho, Kingdom of →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia debt policy rating in Lesotho, Kingdom of?
Cpia debt policy rating in Lesotho, Kingdom of was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Lesotho, Kingdom of?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Lesotho, Kingdom of?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
How does Lesotho, Kingdom of rank for cpia debt policy rating?
Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 29th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia debt policy rating rising or falling in Lesotho, Kingdom of?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Lesotho, Kingdom of data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA debt policy rating in Lesotho, Kingdom of. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-debt-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-debt-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/lesotho/">CPIA debt policy rating in Lesotho, Kingdom of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).