CPIA debt policy rating in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: CPIA debt policy rating was 3.16 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA debt policy rating in Upper middle income, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia debt policy rating in Upper middle income is 3.16 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.1% on the previous year and up 3.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia debt policy rating in Upper middle income peaked at 3.91 1=low to 6=high in 2007 and was at its lowest, 2.93 1=low to 6=high, in 2017.
Upper middle income ranks 18th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA debt policy rating in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.84 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.84 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.91 1=low to 6=high | +1.7% |
| 2008 | 3.91 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.85 1=low to 6=high | -1.4% |
| 2010 | 3.74 1=low to 6=high | -3.1% |
| 2011 | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | -5.6% |
| 2012 | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | -5.3% |
| 2013 | 3.26 1=low to 6=high | -2.4% |
| 2014 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | -6.1% |
| 2015 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.96 1=low to 6=high | -3.2% |
| 2017 | 2.93 1=low to 6=high | -1.2% |
| 2018 | 2.96 1=low to 6=high | +1.2% |
| 2019 | 2.97 1=low to 6=high | +0.1% |
| 2020 | 2.96 1=low to 6=high | -0.2% |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +1.3% |
| 2022 | 2.96 1=low to 6=high | -1.2% |
| 2023 | 2.96 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | +3.3% |
| 2025 | 3.16 1=low to 6=high | +3.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.87 1=low to 6=high | 3.84 1=low to 6=high | 3.91 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 2.93 1=low to 6=high | 3.74 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | 2.96 1=low to 6=high | 3.16 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
More public sector data for Upper middle income
- Arms imports 8.06 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 2.63 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 2.75 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 8.06 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 179.69 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0172 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 6.71 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 551.35 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 176.55 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia debt policy rating in Upper middle income?
- Cpia debt policy rating in Upper middle income was 3.16 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 3.91 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
- What is the lowest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.93 1=low to 6=high in 2017.
- How does Upper middle income rank for cpia debt policy rating?
- Upper middle income ranks 18th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia debt policy rating rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).