CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) in Cape Verde
Cape Verde: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Cape Verde, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Cape Verde stood at 4 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Cape Verde peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2013 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Cape Verde 6th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) in Cape Verde, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2014 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Cape Verde compared with similar countries
- Cape Verde's 4 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Cape Verde's 4 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3.25 1=low to 6=high, 1.2× the median. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.85 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cape Verde
- 6 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Bolivia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Cote d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 India 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Kosovo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Mauritania 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Mozambique 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Senegal 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Tajikistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Tonga 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Vietnam 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Cape Verde
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 5.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0013 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Cape Verde?
- Cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Cape Verde was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Cape Verde?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- What is the lowest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Cape Verde?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Cape Verde rank for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- Cape Verde ranks 6th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating rising or falling in Cape Verde?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cape Verde data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.