CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating was 3.17 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) is 3.17 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.8% on the previous year and down 6.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 3.44 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.17 1=low to 6=high, in 2025.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 28th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | -3.1% |
| 2007 | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
| 2009 | 3.39 1=low to 6=high | +0.5% |
| 2010 | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2011 | 3.39 1=low to 6=high | +0.8% |
| 2012 | 3.41 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
| 2013 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 3.41 1=low to 6=high | +1.2% |
| 2016 | 3.39 1=low to 6=high | -0.5% |
| 2017 | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | -2.6% |
| 2020 | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2021 | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | -0.2% |
| 2022 | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | -1.4% |
| 2023 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
| 2024 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.41 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
More public sector data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Arms imports 387.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.4116 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -31.02 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 387.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 14.3 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0117 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 4.7 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 13.44 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 28.9 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 3.17 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.44 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.17 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 28th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.