CPIA financial sector rating in Pacific island small states
Pacific island small states: CPIA financial sector rating was 2.83 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA financial sector rating in Pacific island small states, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia financial sector rating in Pacific island small states stood at 2.83 1=low to 6=high.
That represents a change of up 3.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia financial sector rating in Pacific island small states peaked at 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 2.75 1=low to 6=high, in 2013.
Pacific island small states ranks 20th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA financial sector rating in Pacific island small states, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +3.1% |
| 2010 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.07 1=low to 6=high | -6.9% |
| 2012 | 2.94 1=low to 6=high | -4.4% |
| 2013 | 2.75 1=low to 6=high | -6.4% |
| 2014 | 2.75 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.75 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.81 1=low to 6=high | +2.3% |
| 2017 | 2.81 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.81 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.81 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.83 1=low to 6=high | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 2.78 1=low to 6=high | -2.0% |
| 2022 | 2.78 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.78 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.83 1=low to 6=high | +2.0% |
| 2025 | 2.83 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | 2.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.81 1=low to 6=high | 2.78 1=low to 6=high | 2.83 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
More public sector data for Pacific island small states
- Tax revenue 20.9% (2023)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 4.0% (2023)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) -1.8% (2023)
- Net incurrence of liabilities, total 3.0% (2023)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 8.8% (2025)
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with 76,359 number of cases (2023)
- Net acquisition of financial assets 0.5% (2023)
- CPIA business regulatory environment rating 2.78 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA debt policy rating 3.06 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA economic management cluster average 3.13 1=low to 6=high (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia financial sector rating in Pacific island small states?
- Cpia financial sector rating in Pacific island small states was 2.83 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Pacific island small states?
- The highest recorded value was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- What is the lowest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Pacific island small states?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.75 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- How does Pacific island small states rank for cpia financial sector rating?
- Pacific island small states ranks 20th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia financial sector rating rising or falling in Pacific island small states?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Pacific island small states data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.