CPIA fiscal policy rating in Armenia
Armenia: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Armenia, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2013, cpia fiscal policy rating in Armenia stood at 5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Armenia peaked at 5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Armenia 1st out of 84 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Armenia, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 1=low to 6=high | 5 1=low to 6=high | 5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 5 1=low to 6=high | 5 1=low to 6=high | 5 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Armenia
- 2 Azerbaijan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Côte d'Ivoire 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Georgia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Mauritania 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Samoa 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Armenia
- Arms imports 21.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 6.92 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0008 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 200 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 21.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 467.45 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0546 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 6.92 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 1.42 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 248.23 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Armenia?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Armenia was 5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Armenia?
- The highest recorded value was 5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Armenia?
- The lowest recorded value was 5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Armenia rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Armenia ranks 1st out of 84 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Armenia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Armenia data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.