CPIA fiscal policy rating in Grenada
Grenada: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Grenada, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia fiscal policy rating in Grenada stood at 4 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Grenada peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2023 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2007.
That places Grenada 7th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Grenada, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2008 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2020 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2024 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Grenada
- 7 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Cameroon 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Dominica 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Ethiopia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Kosovo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Nicaragua 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Rwanda 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Tanzania, United Republic of 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Uzbekistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Grenada
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 3.74 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 94 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 1.57 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 0 units per person (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 0 units per US$ of GDP (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 0.011 units per square kilometre (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 0 units per person (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 0 units per US$ of GDP (2019)
- Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices 0.0938 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 0.0046 units per square kilometre (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Grenada?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Grenada was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Grenada?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2023.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Grenada?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
- How does Grenada rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Grenada ranks 7th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Grenada?
- Over the last ten years it is up 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Grenada data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.