CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high) in Honduras
Honduras: CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high) was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Honduras, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia fiscal policy rating in Honduras is 3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 14.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Honduras peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2013.
Honduras ranks 45th of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high) in Honduras, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4 1=low to 6=high | -11.1% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2016 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2022 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Honduras compared with similar countries
- Honduras's 3 1=low to 6=high is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 86% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Honduras's 3 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 86% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Honduras
- 45 Angola 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Mongolia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Niger 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Uganda 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Honduras
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.6466 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Honduras?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Honduras was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Honduras?
- The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Honduras?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- How does Honduras rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Honduras ranks 45th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Honduras?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Honduras data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.