CPIA fiscal policy rating in Small states
Small states: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 2.98 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Small states, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia fiscal policy rating in Small states is 2.98 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.7% on the previous year and down 1.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Small states peaked at 3.32 1=low to 6=high in 2010 and was at its lowest, 2.98 1=low to 6=high, in 2025.
That places Small states 27th out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Small states, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | -4.1% |
| 2007 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2008 | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 3.26 1=low to 6=high | +2.8% |
| 2010 | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | +1.8% |
| 2011 | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | -3.4% |
| 2012 | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | -5.0% |
| 2013 | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | +0.8% |
| 2017 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +1.6% |
| 2018 | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2019 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | +1.6% |
| 2020 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | -1.0% |
| 2021 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | -1.5% |
| 2023 | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2025 | 2.98 1=low to 6=high | -0.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.04 1=low to 6=high | 2.98 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
More public sector data for Small states
- Arms imports 162.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 8.25 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 162.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 215.46 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
- Tax revenue 20.5% (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 24.1% (2022)
- Taxes on goods and services 33.4% (2022)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 3.0% (2019)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) -2.2% (2019)
- Interest payments 1.8% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Small states?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Small states was 2.98 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Small states?
- The highest recorded value was 3.32 1=low to 6=high in 2010.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Small states?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.98 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
- How does Small states rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Small states ranks 27th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Small states?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Small states data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.