CPIA gender equality rating in Eritrea, The State of
Eritrea, The State of: CPIA gender equality rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA gender equality rating in Eritrea, The State of, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia gender equality rating in Eritrea, The State of stood at 3 1=low to 6=high.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in Eritrea, The State of peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2016.
Eritrea, The State of ranks 48th of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Eritrea, The State of
- 48 Angola 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Comoros, Union of the 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Congo, Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Dominica 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 India 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Mali 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Micronesia, Federated States of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Niger 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Tonga 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Uganda 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 48 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Eritrea, The State of
- Arms imports 4.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2007)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 1.46 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2007)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2007)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 23.75 % change on previous year (2005)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 4.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2007)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 33.05 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2007)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 74.96 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 246.32 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 15.17 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 0 units per person (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia gender equality rating in Eritrea, The State of?
- Cpia gender equality rating in Eritrea, The State of was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Eritrea, The State of?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Eritrea, The State of?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2016.
- How does Eritrea, The State of rank for cpia gender equality rating?
- Eritrea, The State of ranks 48th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in Eritrea, The State of?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Eritrea, The State of data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.