CPIA gender equality rating in Pacific island small states
Pacific island small states: CPIA gender equality rating was 3.28 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA gender equality rating in Pacific island small states, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia gender equality rating in Pacific island small states is 3.28 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 9.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in Pacific island small states peaked at 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2020 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
Pacific island small states ranks 20th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA gender equality rating in Pacific island small states, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -3.2% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | +2.1% |
| 2017 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | +4.1% |
| 2020 | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | +4.6% |
| 2021 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | -1.7% |
| 2022 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
More public sector data for Pacific island small states
- Tax revenue 20.9% (2023)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 4.0% (2023)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) -1.8% (2023)
- Net incurrence of liabilities, total 3.0% (2023)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 8.8% (2025)
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with 76,359 number of cases (2023)
- Net acquisition of financial assets 0.5% (2023)
- CPIA business regulatory environment rating 2.78 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA debt policy rating 3.06 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA economic management cluster average 3.13 1=low to 6=high (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia gender equality rating in Pacific island small states?
- Cpia gender equality rating in Pacific island small states was 3.28 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Pacific island small states?
- The highest recorded value was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Pacific island small states?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Pacific island small states rank for cpia gender equality rating?
- Pacific island small states ranks 20th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in Pacific island small states?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Pacific island small states data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.