CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average was 4.1 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▲ Rising

Latest (2015)
4.1 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
2nd
of 85 countries
All-time high
4.1 1=low to 6=high
in 2014
All-time low
3.8 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
11
2005–2015

CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Viet Nam, 2005–2015

012342005201020152005: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.9 1=low to 6=high2007: 4 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 4 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4.1 1=low to 6=high2015: 4.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Viet Nam is 4.1 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2015. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Viet Nam peaked at 4.1 1=low to 6=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 3.8 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 85 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Viet Nam, 2005 to 2015.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.8 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.9 1=low to 6=high +2.6%
2007 4 1=low to 6=high +2.6%
2008 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 4.1 1=low to 6=high +2.5%
2015 4.1 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.94 1=low to 6=high 3.8 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4.03 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4.1 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 1 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 2 Bhutan 4.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 2 Georgia 4.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 5 Armenia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 5 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 5 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 5 Côte d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 5 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 5 Uzbekistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Viet Nam?
Cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Viet Nam was 4.1 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 4.1 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
What is the lowest cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 3.8 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Viet Nam rank for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
Viet Nam ranks 2nd out of 85 countries with data for 2015.
Is cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is up 7.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policies-for-social-inclusion-equity-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policies-for-social-inclusion-equity-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/viet-nam/">CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,457 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.