CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Late-demographic dividend
Late-demographic dividend: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3.42 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Late-demographic dividend, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Late-demographic dividend recorded 3.42 1=low to 6=high for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.5% on the previous year and down 0.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Late-demographic dividend peaked at 3.45 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 3.27 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.
Late-demographic dividend ranks 4th of 42 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Late-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.31 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | -1.2% |
| 2007 | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | +1.5% |
| 2008 | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | +1.4% |
| 2010 | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | +2.6% |
| 2012 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | -1.4% |
| 2013 | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | -1.5% |
| 2014 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.7% |
| 2015 | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | +1.9% |
| 2016 | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | -0.6% |
| 2017 | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | -1.7% |
| 2020 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +1.3% |
| 2021 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | -2.0% |
| 2023 | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | +2.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Late-demographic dividend
- 1 Bhutan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Ghana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Saint Lucia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Tonga 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Tuvalu 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Late-demographic dividend
- Arms imports 6.92 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 2.97 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -9.75 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 6.92 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 259.7 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0202 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 14.9 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 604.82 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 172.06 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Late-demographic dividend?
- Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Late-demographic dividend was 3.42 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Late-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 3.45 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Late-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.27 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- How does Late-demographic dividend rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
- Late-demographic dividend ranks 4th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Late-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Late-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.