CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Pacific island small states
Pacific island small states: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3.56 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Pacific island small states, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Pacific island small states stood at 3.56 1=low to 6=high.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Pacific island small states peaked at 3.62 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 3.3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Pacific island small states ranks 1st of 42 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Pacific island small states, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +6.1% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | +2.9% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -2.8% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | +3.6% |
| 2020 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -3.4% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | +1.6% |
| 2024 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.52 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Pacific island small states
- 1 Bhutan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Ghana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Saint Lucia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Tonga 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Tuvalu 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Pacific island small states
- Tax revenue 20.9% (2023)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 4.0% (2023)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) -1.8% (2023)
- Net incurrence of liabilities, total 3.0% (2023)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 8.8% (2025)
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with 76,359 number of cases (2023)
- Net acquisition of financial assets 0.5% (2023)
- CPIA business regulatory environment rating 2.78 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA debt policy rating 3.06 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA economic management cluster average 3.13 1=low to 6=high (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Pacific island small states?
- Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Pacific island small states was 3.56 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Pacific island small states?
- The highest recorded value was 3.62 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Pacific island small states?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Pacific island small states rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
- Pacific island small states ranks 1st out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Pacific island small states?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Pacific island small states data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.