CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Post-demographic dividend

Post-demographic dividend: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
18th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Post-demographic dividend, 2005–2013

01232005200920132005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Post-demographic dividend is 3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Post-demographic dividend peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Post-demographic dividend 18th out of 42 groups with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Post-demographic dividend, year by year

Annual values for CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high) in Post-demographic dividend, 2005 to 2013.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3 1=low to 6=high
2006 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 4

More public sector data for Post-demographic dividend

All data for Post-demographic dividend →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Post-demographic dividend?
Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Post-demographic dividend was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Post-demographic dividend rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
Post-demographic dividend ranks 18th out of 42 groups with data for 2013.
Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Post-demographic dividend?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Post-demographic dividend data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Post-demographic dividend. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-property-rights-and-rule-based-governance-rating-1-low-to-6-high/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-property-rights-and-rule-based-governance-rating-1-low-to-6-high/post-demographic-dividend/">CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Post-demographic dividend</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.