CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Kosovo

Kosovo: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
4.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 12.5%
World rank
1st
of 85 countries
All-time high
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
All-time low
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2009
Years of data
17
2009–2025

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Kosovo, 2009–2025

0123452009201720252009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 4 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 4 1=low to 6=high2016: 4 1=low to 6=high2017: 4 1=low to 6=high2018: 4 1=low to 6=high2019: 4 1=low to 6=high2020: 4 1=low to 6=high2021: 4 1=low to 6=high2022: 4 1=low to 6=high2023: 4 1=low to 6=high2024: 4 1=low to 6=high2025: 4.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Kosovo stood at 4.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is up 12.5% on the previous year and up 12.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Kosovo peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2009.

Kosovo ranks 1st of 85 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Kosovo, year by year

Annual values for CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high) in Kosovo, 2009 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2009 4 1=low to 6=high
2010 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 4.5 1=low to 6=high +12.5%

Kosovo compared with similar countries

  • Kosovo's 4.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.3× the median. (21 countries reporting)
  • Kosovo's 4.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (9 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 1
2010s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 4.08 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 1 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 1 Bhutan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 1 Georgia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Kosovo?
Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Kosovo was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
How does Kosovo rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
Kosovo ranks 1st out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Kosovo?
Over the last ten years it is up 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Kosovo. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-budgetary-and-financial-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/kosovo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-budgetary-and-financial-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/kosovo/">CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Kosovo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.