CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Maldives
Maldives: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Maldives, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Maldives stood at 3 1=low to 6=high.
That represents a change of up 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Maldives peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2022 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.
That places Maldives 36th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Maldives, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Maldives compared with similar countries
- Maldives's 3 1=low to 6=high is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 86% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Maldives's 3 1=low to 6=high is below the median for South Asia, which is 3.25 1=low to 6=high, 92% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Maldives
- 36 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Chad 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Congo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Grenada 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Kyrgyzstan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Mali 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Papua New Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Senegal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Saint Lucia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Timor-Leste 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Maldives
- Arms imports 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 13.26 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 6,667 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
- Tax revenue 19.5% (2021)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 110.64 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 12.7% (2021)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 133.64 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 14.77 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Maldives?
- Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Maldives was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Maldives?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2022.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Maldives?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
- How does Maldives rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
- Maldives ranks 36th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Maldives?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Maldives data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.