CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) in Fiji
Fiji: CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA quality of public administration rating in Fiji, 2020–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia quality of public administration rating in Fiji stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
That places Fiji 6th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) in Fiji, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Fiji compared with similar countries
- Fiji's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Fiji's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 2.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.4× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Fiji
- 6 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high
- 6 Benin 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Cote d'Ivoire 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Djibouti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high
- 6 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high
- 6 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high
More public sector data for Fiji
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 17.23 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0027 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of public administration rating in Fiji?
- Cpia quality of public administration rating in Fiji was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Fiji?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Fiji?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- How does Fiji rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?
- Fiji ranks 6th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in Fiji?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Fiji data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).