CPIA quality of public administration rating in IBRD only
IBRD only: CPIA quality of public administration rating was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat
CPIA quality of public administration rating in IBRD only, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2019, cpia quality of public administration rating in IBRD only stood at 3.25 1=low to 6=high.
The figure is down 1.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of public administration rating in IBRD only peaked at 3.38 1=low to 6=high in 2015 and was at its lowest, 3.12 1=low to 6=high, in 2014.
That places IBRD only 2nd out of 42 groups with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
CPIA quality of public administration rating in IBRD only, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | -3.4% |
| 2007 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.6% |
| 2008 | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | +3.1% |
| 2009 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | -1.5% |
| 2010 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | -4.0% |
| 2012 | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | +1.8% |
| 2013 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | -4.7% |
| 2015 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +8.0% |
| 2016 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | -3.7% |
| 2017 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near IBRD only
More public sector data for IBRD only
- Arms imports 11.74 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 2.36 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -10.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 11.74 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 171.58 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.021 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 12.21 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 854.40 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 184.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of public administration rating in IBRD only?
- Cpia quality of public administration rating in IBRD only was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in IBRD only?
- The highest recorded value was 3.38 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in IBRD only?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.12 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
- How does IBRD only rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?
- IBRD only ranks 2nd out of 42 groups with data for 2019.
- Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in IBRD only?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this IBRD only data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).