CPIA quality of public administration rating in IDA blend

IDA blend: CPIA quality of public administration rating was 3.08 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.08 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 0.9%
Rank
10th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.17 1=low to 6=high
in 2014
All-time low
2.97 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA quality of public administration rating in IDA blend, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia quality of public administration rating in IDA blend is 3.08 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.

The figure is up 0.9% on the previous year and down 0.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia quality of public administration rating in IDA blend peaked at 3.17 1=low to 6=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 2.97 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

IDA blend ranks 10th of 42 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.

CPIA quality of public administration rating in IDA blend, year by year

Annual values for CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) in IDA blend, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3 1=low to 6=high
2006 2.97 1=low to 6=high -1.1%
2007 2.97 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 2.97 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3 1=low to 6=high +1.1%
2010 3.07 1=low to 6=high +2.2%
2011 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.03 1=low to 6=high -1.1%
2014 3.17 1=low to 6=high +4.4%
2015 3.1 1=low to 6=high -2.1%
2016 3.07 1=low to 6=high -1.1%
2017 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.1 1=low to 6=high +1.1%
2020 3.09 1=low to 6=high -0.2%
2021 3.12 1=low to 6=high +1.0%
2022 3.16 1=low to 6=high +1.0%
2023 3.16 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.05 1=low to 6=high -3.3%
2025 3.08 1=low to 6=high +0.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.98 1=low to 6=high 2.97 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.08 1=low to 6=high 3.03 1=low to 6=high 3.17 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.11 1=low to 6=high 3.05 1=low to 6=high 3.16 1=low to 6=high 6

More public sector data for IDA blend

All data for IDA blend →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia quality of public administration rating in IDA blend?
Cpia quality of public administration rating in IDA blend was 3.08 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in IDA blend?
The highest recorded value was 3.17 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in IDA blend?
The lowest recorded value was 2.97 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does IDA blend rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?
IDA blend ranks 10th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in IDA blend?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this IDA blend data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA quality of public administration rating in IDA blend. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-public-administration-rating-1-low-to-6-high/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-public-administration-rating-1-low-to-6-high/ida-blend/">CPIA quality of public administration rating in IDA blend</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).