Statizoid

CPIA social protection rating in Latin America & Caribbean

Latin America & Caribbean: CPIA social protection rating was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.25 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
12th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.39 1=low to 6=high
in 2008
All-time low
3.12 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA social protection rating in Latin America & Caribbean, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Latin America & Caribbean recorded 3.25 1=low to 6=high for cpia social protection rating in 2025.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia social protection rating in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 3.39 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3.12 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

That places Latin America & Caribbean 12th out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

CPIA social protection rating in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.38 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.12 1=low to 6=high -7.4%
2007 3.38 1=low to 6=high +8.0%
2008 3.39 1=low to 6=high +0.4%
2009 3.33 1=low to 6=high -1.6%
2010 3.28 1=low to 6=high -1.7%
2011 3.22 1=low to 6=high -1.7%
2012 3.28 1=low to 6=high +1.7%
2013 3.22 1=low to 6=high -1.7%
2014 3.22 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.17 1=low to 6=high -1.7%
2016 3.12 1=low to 6=high -1.3%
2017 3.19 1=low to 6=high +2.0%
2018 3.25 1=low to 6=high +2.0%
2019 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3.25 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.32 1=low to 6=high 3.12 1=low to 6=high 3.39 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.22 1=low to 6=high 3.12 1=low to 6=high 3.28 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.25 1=low to 6=high 3.25 1=low to 6=high 3.25 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean

  1. 10 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 10 Benin 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 10 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 10 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 10 Côte d'Ivoire 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 10 Djibouti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 10 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 10 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 10 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 10 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 10 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 10 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 10 Kiribati 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 10 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 10 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 10 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 10 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 10 Mauritania 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 10 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 10 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 10 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 10 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 10 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 10 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  25. 10 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  26. 10 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  27. 10 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  28. 10 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  29. 10 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  30. 10 Viet Nam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  31. 10 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  32. 10 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Latin America & Caribbean

All data for Latin America & Caribbean →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia social protection rating in Latin America & Caribbean?
Cpia social protection rating in Latin America & Caribbean was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia social protection rating recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
The highest recorded value was 3.39 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
What is the lowest cpia social protection rating recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
The lowest recorded value was 3.12 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for cpia social protection rating?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 12th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia social protection rating rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA social protection rating in Latin America & Caribbean. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-social-protection-rating-1-low-to-6-high/latin-america-and-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-social-protection-rating-1-low-to-6-high/latin-america-and-caribbean/">CPIA social protection rating in Latin America & Caribbean</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,456 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Social Protection criterion assesses government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people. Specifically it evaluates social protection (SP) and labor policies, namely those engaged in risk prevention by supporting savings and risk pooling through social insurance, protection against destitution through redistributive safety net programs and promotion of human capital development and income generation, including labor market programs. It also assesses the functioning of an SP system, including its effectiveness in a crisis and in providing arrangements and incentives to help beneficiaries to move from protection to promotion and prevention, including through interactions with private, informal means of SP. The criterion covers: (a) the overall SP system; (b) social safety net programs; (c) labor markets programs and policies, namely those aiming to promote employment creation and productivity growth while protecting core labor standards and ensuring adequate working conditions; (d) local service delivery and civil society participation in community development programs; and (e) pension and old age savings programs.