CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high) in Micronesia (country)
Micronesia (country): CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high) was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA social protection rating in Micronesia (country), 2011–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Micronesia (country) recorded 2 1=low to 6=high for cpia social protection rating in 2025. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia social protection rating in Micronesia (country) peaked at 2 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
That places Micronesia (country) 78th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high) in Micronesia (country), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2012 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Micronesia (country) compared with similar countries
- Micronesia (country)'s 2 1=low to 6=high is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 57% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Micronesia (country)'s 2 1=low to 6=high is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 2.5 1=low to 6=high, 80% of the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 9 |
| 2020s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)
More public sector data for Micronesia (country)
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 62.15 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0158 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia social protection rating in Micronesia (country)?
- Cpia social protection rating in Micronesia (country) was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia social protection rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The highest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia social protection rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Micronesia (country) rank for cpia social protection rating?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 78th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia social protection rating rising or falling in Micronesia (country)?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Social Protection criterion assesses government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people. Specifically it evaluates social protection (SP) and labor policies, namely those engaged in risk prevention by supporting savings and risk pooling through social insurance, protection against destitution through redistributive safety net programs and promotion of human capital development and income generation, including labor market programs. It also assesses the functioning of an SP system, including its effectiveness in a crisis and in providing arrangements and incentives to help beneficiaries to move from protection to promotion and prevention, including through interactions with private, informal means of SP. The criterion covers: (a) the overall SP system; (b) social safety net programs; (c) labor markets programs and policies, namely those aiming to promote employment creation and productivity growth while protecting core labor standards and ensuring adequate working conditions; (d) local service delivery and civil society participation in community development programs; and (e) pension and old age savings programs.