CPIA trade rating in Mozambique
Mozambique: CPIA trade rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA trade rating in Mozambique, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia trade rating in Mozambique is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is down 12.5% on the previous year and down 12.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia trade rating in Mozambique peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2025.
That places Mozambique 53rd out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.05 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 53 Angola 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Comoros 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Djibouti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Kiribati 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Marshall Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Solomon Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Tanzania, United Republic of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 53 Tuvalu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Mozambique
- Arms imports 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.0289 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -66.67 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 13.01 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0198 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 11.39 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 450.45 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 3.81 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia trade rating in Mozambique?
- Cpia trade rating in Mozambique was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia trade rating recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- What is the lowest cpia trade rating recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
- How does Mozambique rank for cpia trade rating?
- Mozambique ranks 53rd out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia trade rating rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Trade assesses how the policy framework fosters trade in goods.