CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in Grenada
Grenada: CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in Grenada, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Grenada recorded 4 1=low to 6=high for cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in Grenada peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Grenada ranks 4th of 85 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in Grenada, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Grenada compared with similar countries
- Grenada's 4 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Grenada's 4 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.3× the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Grenada
- 1 Bhutan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Cape Verde 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Saint Lucia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Cote d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Dominica 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Ghana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Tuvalu 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Grenada
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 3.74 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 94 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 1.57 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 0 units per person (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in Grenada?
- Cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in Grenada was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public recorded in Grenada?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public recorded in Grenada?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Grenada rank for cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public?
- Grenada ranks 4th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public rising or falling in Grenada?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Grenada data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Transparency, Accountability, and Corruption in the Public Sector criterion assesses the extent to which the executive, legislators, and other high-level officials can be held accountable for their use of funds, administrative decisions, and results obtained. Accountability is generally enhanced by transparency in decision-making, access to relevant and timely information, public and media scrutiny, and by institutional checks (e.g., inspector general, ombudsman, or independent audit) on the authority of the chief executive. The criterion covers four dimensions: (a) the accountability of the executive and other top officials to effective oversight institutions; (b) access of civil society to timely and reliable information on public affairs and public policies, including fiscal information (on public expenditures, revenues, and large contract awards); (c) state capture by narrow vested interests; and (d) integrity in the management of public resources, including aid and natural resource revenues.