Statizoid

CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in IBRD only

IBRD only: CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public was 2.75 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2.75 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
25th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.28 1=low to 6=high
in 2012
All-time low
2.75 1=low to 6=high
in 2018
Years of data
15
2005–2019

CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in IBRD only, 2005–2019

01232005201220192005: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 2.8 1=low to 6=high2019: 2.8 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2019, cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in IBRD only stood at 2.75 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.

The figure is down 8.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in IBRD only peaked at 3.28 1=low to 6=high in 2012 and was at its lowest, 2.75 1=low to 6=high, in 2018.

IBRD only ranks 25th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in IBRD only, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 2.92 1=low to 6=high —
2006 2.96 1=low to 6=high +1.3%
2007 3.05 1=low to 6=high +3.0%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high -1.6%
2009 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3.05 1=low to 6=high +1.7%
2011 3.22 1=low to 6=high +5.6%
2012 3.28 1=low to 6=high +1.7%
2013 3.28 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.25 1=low to 6=high -0.8%
2015 3 1=low to 6=high -7.7%
2016 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 2.75 1=low to 6=high -8.3%
2019 2.75 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.99 1=low to 6=high 2.92 1=low to 6=high 3.05 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.06 1=low to 6=high 2.75 1=low to 6=high 3.28 1=low to 6=high 10

Countries ranked near IBRD only

  1. 24 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 24 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 24 Burkina Faso 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 24 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 24 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 24 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 24 Gambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 24 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 24 Lesotho 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 24 Malawi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 24 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 24 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 24 Mongolia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 24 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 24 Pakistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 24 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 24 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 24 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 24 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 24 Tanzania, United Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 24 Timor-Leste 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 24 Uzbekistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 24 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 24 Viet Nam 3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for IBRD only

All data for IBRD only →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in IBRD only?
Cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in IBRD only was 2.75 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public recorded in IBRD only?
The highest recorded value was 3.28 1=low to 6=high in 2012.
What is the lowest cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public recorded in IBRD only?
The lowest recorded value was 2.75 1=low to 6=high in 2018.
How does IBRD only rank for cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public?
IBRD only ranks 25th out of 42 groups with data for 2019.
Is cpia transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public rising or falling in IBRD only?
Over the last ten years it is down 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this IBRD only data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in IBRD only. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-transparency-accountability-and-corruption-in-the-public-sector-rating-1-low-to-6/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-transparency-accountability-and-corruption-in-the-public-sector-rating-1-low-to-6/ibrd-only/">CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public in IBRD only</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Transparency, Accountability, and Corruption in the Public Sector criterion assesses the extent to which the executive, legislators, and other high-level officials can be held accountable for their use of funds, administrative decisions, and results obtained. Accountability is generally enhanced by transparency in decision-making, access to relevant and timely information, public and media scrutiny, and by institutional checks (e.g., inspector general, ombudsman, or independent audit) on the authority of the chief executive. The criterion covers four dimensions: (a) the accountability of the executive and other top officials to effective oversight institutions; (b) access of civil society to timely and reliable information on public affairs and public policies, including fiscal information (on public expenditures, revenues, and large contract awards); (c) state capture by narrow vested interests; and (d) integrity in the management of public resources, including aid and natural resource revenues.